-
Attorney's explanation of the current inequities in investigating and punishing drunk driving.
-
A critical look at Mothers Against Drunk Driving and its prohibitionist goals, from a professor emeritus at State University of New York.
-
Courts forcing DUI defendants into 12-step programs is unfair and counter-productive.
-
Argues that if MADD has its way, people who make responsible decisions about drinking will be punished.
-
Extensive website presenting balanced information on DUI laws, punishment, rehabilitation and politics, from a San Francisco alcohol abuse counselor.
-
An anti-MADD site that seeks to challenge the courts, legislation and organizations, and provide information designed to assist individuals related to DUI.
-
Reviews the misleading drunk driving statistics provided by the US government and the MADD organization.
-
The NMA supports drinking and driving regulations based on reasonable standards that differentiate between responsible, reasonable behavior and reckless, dangerous behavior.
-
The "New Prohibitionism" wrongly equates use with abuse, and perpetuates the demonstrably false claim that increased alcohol consumption directly correlates to increased highway fatalities.
-
Positions contrary to the prevailing views and policies for combating drunk driving.
-
A group of citizens who contend that the current trend in DUI laws is aimed at criminalizing and punishing responsible drinkers, and is having little, if any, effect in curbing drunk driving.
-
The erosion of our constitutional rights caused by political pressure from MADD. (Audio with transcript).
-
Refutation of arguments supporting lowering the blood-alcohol limit to .08%, from the National College For DUI Defense
